In an opinion piece for the Dallas News, Susan Jacoby argues that Americans are getting dumber, in large measure due to the triumph of video over the written word. She is quite alarmed at the continuing and accelerating declines in the reading habits of Americans:

Reading has declined not only among the poorly educated, according to a report by the National Endowment for the Arts. In 1982, 82 percent of college graduates read novels or poems for pleasure; two decades later, only 67 percent did. And more than 40 percent of Americans under 44 did not read a single book – fiction or nonfiction – over the course of a year. The proportion of 17-year-olds who read nothing more than doubled between 1984 and 2004. This time period, of course, encompasses the rise of personal computers, Web surfing and video games.

Now there are all sorts of arguments on what constitutes learning and intelligence and that it is possible that an antiquated educational system imposes and over emphasizes book-based activity and testing as true indicators of intelligence.

For an argument on the efficacy of reading over video and other new media forms (and why “experts” who recommend videos for babies are crazy), visit Jacoby’s article and I’ll let her do the heavier intellectual lifting. (I’ve got to start reading more.)

I’ll simply cite an inspirational morsel of wisdom from a friend and one of my favorite people in the world, Charlie “Tremendous” Jones:

You are the same today as you’re going to be in five years except for two things, the people you meet and the books you read.

He shifts the discussion beyond the realm of intelligence to encompass personal change and growth — including an active thought life through books. (He also makes a great case that if you want to be bright and intelligent, you need to start hanging out with bright and intelligent people — and avoiding those with the opposite characteristics. Again, that’s another day and another blog!)

One of the most enduring complaints in life is that the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Unfortunately, that really does seem to be the case in regard to the most precious commodity in today’s global intelligence society; intellectual capital.

Not a single book in the past year? Not even one? I’m sure that some individuals who fall in that category really are alert and aware — but how many? And I’m positive that some of us who read a lot of books might still fall into the numbed (and dumbed), dazed, and preoccupied category of the mentally saturated who are decently infotained — but not really engaged in the issues of our day with the thoughtfulness and introspection that can only come when you actually know a few things that you can bring to the conversation.

Whatever import you wish to put on actual books — I learn in other ways — I’ll simply agree and say “fine, have at it; whatever works for you.” But for the person who thinks he or she has arrived and doesn’t need a plan for lifelong learning, I’ll quote the great educator and philosopher John Dewey:

The aim of education is to enable individuals to continue their education …

Or how about the words of Thomas Jefferson:

I know of no safe repository of the ultimate power of society but people. And if we think them not enlightened enough, the remedy is not to take the power from them, but to inform them by education.

The proliferatin of the written word made Jefferson’s admonition easily accessible to all of us — with or without help from government.

Is America getting dumber and does it matter? I’m not sure but I think there’s a special on E! that answers that question that I’ll try to catch tonight.

I know, I know … it’s not right to criticize Brett Favre just one day after his retirement on March 5, 2008. After all, in his 17 seasons in the NFL, he set almost every major record for a quarterback: most touchdown passes (442), most yards (61,655), most completions (5,377), and most interceptions (288). Ignore that last one! Oh, he started 253 consecutive games, second most in NFL history behind only Jim Marshall of the Vikings, won a Superbowl, and was three time league MVP and a 9 time Pro Bowl selection. You get the idea. He was pretty good.

Criticizing Favre is like lecturing Albert Einstein on his penmanship (who’s going to take you seriously when they think you wrote S = MC2); or scolding Luciano Pavarotti for packing a few extra pounds that were really noticeable the last time he sang at the Met in tights (and he probably could have stood to lose a few pounds and inches); or suggesting to Lance Armstrong that yellow really isn’t his color (Lance — have you thought of switching to periwinkle bracelets?).

But I’m going to go ahead and barge in where angels dare not tread and criticize Favre. Brett: you threw off your back foot too much and in so doing you were a terrible example to a generation of young quarterbacks.

Many great quarterback coaches leave their pupils’ throwing motions alone. After all, there have been great college and NFL quarterbacks with a variety of throwing motions (hey Titan fans, there’s hope for Vince Young!). However, the great QB coaches always coach footwork. Length of stride — and of course — stepping into the throw; in other words, throwing off the front foot.

It just so happened the Brett Favre possessed one of the strongest arms that the game has ever known and that allowed him to break almost every rule and still deliver an incredibly accurate and well-timed football to his receivers — with velocity. This trait usually didn’t become a problem until the playoffs when the better teams tend to have better and faster defensive backs. To be fair, not all the teams that Favre led into battle would have had a prayer to make the playoffs in the first place had it not been for their gritty and talented starting quarterback. But it was playoff time when throwing off his back foot, maybe to elude a ferocious rush or buy time while a receiver came open — or maybe out of habit — sometimes resulted in painful interceptions for even Favre.

What does that have to do with young quarterbacks? Simple. Favre made everything look so artistic and effortless that it’s only natural thousands of young quarterbacks would rather look like Brett Favre than step into their throws like their coaches beg them to do in practice drills. Throwing off the back foot usually doesn’t work for mere mortals who just have “arms” connected to their shoulders — and not rocket launchers.

But I do have a suggestion on how Brett Favre can atone for his egregious bad example to the youth of American who play the quarterback position.

Here it is. Brett: just come back for one more year and model a new commitment to old school footwork!

Is that too much to ask?